Jump to content

sumit426

Members
  • Content count

    30
  • Joined

  • Last visited

About sumit426

  • Rank
    Advanced Member

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male
  • Country
    India
  • Interests
    Hyperform, CFD, CRASHFORM, HYPERMESH
  • Are you University user?
    Yes
  1. Dear All, I have a project where a draw operation is required for the 2 sheets joined withTaylor welded/TIG welding process. Can you please tell me the procedure for hyperform simulation?
  2. Dear All, I have a project where a draw operation is required for the 2 sheets joined withTaylor welded/TIG welding process. Can you please tell me the procedure for hyperform simulation?
  3. Dear All, I have got the new material in the Autoform : .mtb format & i want to use the same material properties in hyperform for the simulation. If its posssible ,Can you please tell me what is the procedure to use the same .mtb format ? & if not then which are the ways to read the .mtb file to get all material property values?? Please suggest the good way ASAP Regards, Sumit
  4. Dear Santhosh, I am really thanking you for replying my problem but my actual question is when doing springback (as in your case also), after comparing the springback part with the 00.rad (only forming) part the formed part with springback is inside the part which is not acceptable as shown in fig 1& 2below. The comparison image is in fig no. 3, 4 , Please refer below. (checkout the image 4 the springback part is springing inside (only) formed part. Thanks & Regards, Sumit P.
  5. Hello Santosh, Here Please Find the Attachments, 1) Forming Rar contains forming setup 2) Springback Contains Springback Setup 3) also sent separately the .rad , .hf & h3d File for results Suggest any other method or help me to correct it. Formming.rar Springback.rar sb01.hf sb01.up sb01_0000.rad sb01_0001.rad sb01.h3d
  6. Hello All, Thanks for clearing all my previous queries, Here after many trials of springback simulation using all possible ways of the springback setup (i.e. Using automatic/manual/ auto process/advance tools/multistage). I have found the unacceptable spring back results that , in case of a hat section. Here as shown in fig 2. the hat section part after forming-springback the part is going inside (-ve springback, which is unacceptable), i.e. if we bending/forming/flanging a part with 90° it will be springback with the bend angle as 90°+1or2 degree, but springback bend angle will be always greater than the bend angle. But in this case the springback is showing as shown in FIG 2. Image contains 1. springback part, 2. Actual Part, 3. As per the actual forming procedure Please help me what should I do to evaluate the springback, You can take any Hat section part & form it using Pad ( since it is my Design requirement shown as in fig 1) Please reply,
  7. Hello All, I am starting to analysis of the component, Please share the procedure of the fatigue analysis of any component, and also can we find the life of the component based on its fatigue analysis? Thanks
  8. Hello All, I am meshing some sort of symmetrical blank component, but using by B-mesh and also with Automesh I am not getting any symmetrical meshing, What to do to optimize the meshing element, Is there any kind of Advance meshing editing tool to change or edit the meshing element along the line/path in the existing mesh? if so or any other tool is there please suggest for the same. (I have added the pic of component) Thanks
  9. Hello All, Can you please tell me how to use this spring loaded force? If any video or procedure please share.. What does Max stroke indicate? and how to calculate it? If any video or procedure you have then please share..
  10. Thank you sir for explaining me. Can you please tell me how to read the predicted press tonnage in **.out file?
  11. Hello, While calculating the actual draw tonnage for the setup given in (ref.) IMAGE 1 ( O.K. in FLD & %Thinning), I have following doubts in calculation of the tonnage calculation in HyperGraph as: 1. In forming setup the binder force is 15T is used, but in the hypergraph it is showing more that 20T , so which should be consider as actual or required binder force to freeze the model setup? 2. How to calculate the actual Draw tonnage from the die(upper steel) & blank contact graph as shown in the IMAGE 2, i.e. which of the following point should select to define the required draw tonnage from die(upper steel) & blank contact curve (Ref. IMAGE 2)= A. At the End point i.e. complete bottoming stage? or B. At the Point where maximum tonnage is showing in the graph for the die(upper steel) & blank contact curve?
  12. for the theoretical calculations checkout Mechanics of sheet metal forming book for the forming calculations & for basic theory handbook of die design
  13. sumit426

    regarding apativity level

    Hello, I have bending radius with 5 mm and sheet metal (blank) thickness 1mm, then in the forming setup what is correspondence of the level of adaptivity. on the basis of adaptivity theory how can we decide the level of adaptivity?
  14. sumit426

    how to save session

    ok Thank you sir
×