Jump to content

marioke

Members
  • Content Count

    6
  • Joined

  • Last visited

About marioke

  • Rank
    Newbie

Profile Information

  • Country
    Germany
  • Are you University user?
    Yes

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. Hi, I created a study where I want to analyse the effects of varying plythickness and plyangle of a carbon plate. I defined plythickness and plyangle of every ply as design variable (parameterized file) and then created a DoE. Now i got problems with the response. I dont want to see the composite stress for each Element as itself, but for each ply to have a better overview of the effects. Is there a possibility of filtering my response? By defining my response, I can select the element which is evaluated regarding composite stress. I exactly need the same for selecting a whole ply. Thanks for your support. Regards
  2. Prakash, i didn't model all plies, I modeled as you said. Creating 5 plies leads to 10 plies because of symmetric option. But my problem could not be solved by dividing the length of my plies in more segments.
  3. Hi, that means that I have to define a ply for every "row" of elements in my plate?
  4. Hi there, my problem is as followes: i built up a squarish composite plate (carbon) with orthotropic material property. I edited the laminate with "symmetric" option to realize the orthotropic material behave. Now my problem is that I want to check the material behave varying ply direction and ply thickness. So the plate should obtain 10 mm height on the left edge and 9 mm on the right edge to simulate an angular load initiation, Now the symmetric laminate option causes a result which I dont want to realize (see attachment). Can you tell me how to realize that? Maybe with shell to solid conversion (how do i get there?)? Regards
×
×
  • Create New...