Jump to content

Simon Križnik

Members
  • Content Count

    1072
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    98

Everything posted by Simon Križnik

  1. Actually, the deactivation of nodes was due to another interface (type 7) and it was solved by setting the Irem_gap to 1. I would still like to know the reason of WARNING ID : 852
  2. Hi, I am trying to run a model with tied interface (Type 2) and AMS. The interface is defined with contact surface as master and nodes on the slave side. During starter the following warning appears: WARNING ID : 852 ** WARNING SLAVE NODE OF AN INTERFACE TYPE2 & AMS and during computation: WARNING INTERFACE 2 NODE xxx DE-ACTIVATED FROM INTERFACE Can this deactivation of slave nodes be avoided when using AMS and type 2 interface? The same model was run successfully using DT/NODA/CST.
  3. Just wanted to update: the problem was I did not give reduction factor (R_E) which is 1 by default on material law 19 (fabric), so elastic modulus is the same in compression and tension. Bellow is the simulation with R_E at 0.001 giving good results.
  4. Hi, I am trying to convert Radioss file containing monitored volume (perfect gas) to Optistruct. In the convert browser the monitored volume is marked green i.e. "all active attributes for a given entity are mapped". After conversion there is control volume listed as type airbag, but with no parameters other than entity selection. When running analysis in Optistruct (static and explicit dynamic) it seems like monitored volume has no effect on the results. Am I missing something?
  5. Thanks again, Prakash. Actually, I was referring to minimum thickness (THICK), not member size (MEMBSIZ), but the syntax is the same. I am still having difficulty setting up radopt so looking forward to GUI.
  6. Hi matteoconese, you can check transparency in Surface Transparency Panel (shortcut ctrl+t).
  7. Hi Alexander, after checking the box, click return and then click update in the responses panel. What is the point of using weighted compliance with only one loadstep?
  8. Hi Prakash, thanks for the info. How is the minimum thickness defined in radopt syntax? I was unable to run with the following:
  9. Hi George, my issue with stress response is the run terminates at the end of first outer loop with ERROR # 382 (as described in my opening post) so I get no results. Apparently there is no such problem on your end since you managed to get some results at all. I have no idea what could be the cause, if you did not modify the files.
  10. Hi George, I tried as instructed but the issue remains- it looks like solver runs just as well with either *.rad or *.radopt file extensions. The issue seems to be with stress response in particular, because other responses worked fine.
  11. Hi all, I am trying to perform optimization in Radioss through -radopt command. The trouble is that computation terminates at the end of first outer loop when stress response is used: I have attached files, if anyone would like to check it out. test1_0000.rad test1_0001.rad test1.rad
  12. Thanks for the tip, George. It is worth mentioning that the spring element must connect slave nodes of different rigid bodies.
  13. Hi, can someone upload a file where KJOINT is used (for example with revolute joint)? I tried to follow the steps by LoHo, but I struggle to understand step 3. Relate SPRING2N to FE-Mesh or rigids
  14. Is it possible to model the fabric hinge in Radioss with cable (tension only) instead of shell elements? In Optistruct this can be achieved with CGAP element, however I could not convert or use it with Radioss solver.
  15. Hi Prakash, thanks for assistance- I will check it out.
  16. Hi, I truly appreciate your help in resolving the issue.
  17. Hi, the element formulations are: ISHELL: 4 Ismstr: 4 I sent the file- thanks for assistance.
  18. Hi Prakash, second order elements almost simulated the collapse I was looking for sort of In the attached animation it can be seen that second order shell elements were converted to nodes and detached from wood panels. What did I miss?
  19. Thanks for the tip, however the results are the same with LAW58. The model is attached if anyone would like to check in case I made some mistake. Alternative material/property combination is Kevlar2 & Hinge2. In this research paper (page 34) it is suggested to use Mooney-Rivlin material in Optistruct (probably MATX42) as substitution for fabric material. detail3.hm
  20. Hi, I am simulating in Radioss a fabric hinge (similar to a living hinge with flexible woven material). Using M19_FABRI material card in combination with P9_SH_ORTH property card I can simulate the out-of-plane bending of the fabric hinge. But simulating the in-plane shear is challenging. In the attached image, the gravity is acting in negative Z direction and the sample is fixed encastre on the left side. The expected behaviour is collapse of the fabric hinge in the middle (between two wood panels). However the sample is behaving like it is made out of uniform elastic material and is only deforming slightly (defromation is 1000x scaled). Does anyone have an explanation? I would also like to use the same material in Optistruct, but I could not find equivalent material law for flexible fabric. any suggestion would be appreciated
×
×
  • Create New...