Jump to content

Subhu

Members
  • Content Count

    33
  • Joined

  • Last visited

2 Followers

About Subhu

  • Rank
    Advanced Member

Profile Information

  • Country
    India
  • Are you University user?
    Yes

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. Hi, I have a transient analysis in MBD with Flexible bodies. I want to evaluate the fatigue strength and damage of welds of the same in n-code. What are the possible ways to do it? Any Documents for reference would be very helpful. Thanks!
  2. Hi Hyperman, How to extract/output modal participation factor from Motionsolve? TIA! Regards, Subhu
  3. Hi Hyperman and All, Actually I am working on an agri-equipment and planning to investigate on it's fatigue behavior. It is an assembly/mechanism operated around 1500 rpm. I am eager to know whether there will be difference in loads extracted between rigid body analysis and flexible body analysis? Regards, Subhu
  4. Hello Gents, Is it possible to Extract Load with Rigidbody Analysis in Motionsolve? Thanks in Advance!
  5. Thanks george, I have also applied Ikrem=0, still there is a warning for Incompatible Kinematic error. How can i define Rwall and Ground interface.
  6. Hi, I am working in crash, while running starter in radioss it is adviced to run without any incompatible kinematic condition warning. But in my model it shows there was an incompatible kinematic conditions in the model. Mainly it shows this error in RWALL & GROUND Interface. How to rectify it ?? Is there any solution for this. WARNING ID : 446 ** WARNING IN RIGID WALL DESCRIPTION : -- RIGID WALL ID : 384 -- RIGID WALL TITLE : GROUND 98530 NODES HAVE BEEN REMOVED FROM RWALL, DUE TO INCOMPATIBLE KINEMATIC CONDITIONS WARNING ID : 446 ** WARNING IN RIGID WALL DESCRIPTION : -- RIGID WALL ID : 385 -- RIGID WALL TITLE : RIGID_WALL 98530 NODES HAVE BEEN REMOVED FROM RWALL, DUE TO INCOMPATIBLE KINEMATIC CONDITIONS WARNING ID : 312 ** INCOMPATIBLE KINEMATIC CONDITIONS IN MODEL DESCRIPTION : 3654046 INCOMPATIBLE KINEMATIC CONDITIONS IN MODEL SUMMARY OF POSSIBLE INCOMPATIBLE KINEMATIC CONDITIONS : ----------------------------------------------------- - POSSIBLE INCOMPATIBLE KINEMATIC CONDITIONS BETWEEN SEVERAL INTERFACES TYPE 1 2 12 OR 9 - POSSIBLE INCOMPATIBLE KINEMATIC CONDITIONS BETWEEN SEVERAL RIGID WALLS Kindly suggest some solution for this. Thanks in advance
  7. Thank You George, The shell, solid and spring elements are corrected for 1e-7 time step. Type 7 contact is appended with dt min of 2e-6 And my on running .out is... 7540 0.7837E-02 0.9164E-06 INTER 3189 -0.1% 0.5093E+07 0.3628E+09 0.1387E+05 -0.3399E+05 4.611 What is maximum type step we can impose?? Regards, Subhu
  8. HI all, As like mass addition, Is it possible to remove mass uniformly?? I am Increasing the time step, which results in mass addition. and thus kinetic energy is increased. It reulted in larger intrusion. Since I need some very approx result immediately , I need to reduce the actual structural mass and have to run it again. Is it possible remove or reduce the structural mass uniformly??? Thanks in ADvance
  9. Hi All, I am doing a Explict ANalysis. I am getting this Issue of Negative INertia or Zero Inertia. Help me to sort this out. RIGID BODY ID 3590470 PRIMARY NODE 2446786 NEW X,Y,Z 16.85505 -499.7750 63.76619 NEW MASS 0.1000000E-19 NEW INERTIA xx yy zz 0.3281661E-46 0.5048710E-48 0.3231174E-46 NEW INERTIA xy yz zx 0.3341664E-87 0.4038968E-47 0.2378653E-87 PRINCIPAL INERTIA 3.2816613657194E-47 3.2816613657194E-47 0.000000000000 ERROR ID : 274 ** ERROR IN RIGID BODY DEFINITION (INERTIA) DESCRIPTION : -- RIGID BODY ID : 3590470 -- RIGID BODY TITLE : RIGID BODY HAS A NULL OR NEGATIVE INERTIA Thanks in Advance. Regards, SUBHU
  10. Hi, What is the unit of moment of inertia displayed here in summary? Regards SUBHU
  11. Subhu

    AMS

    Hi All, I am Running a Frontal crash Analysis. Will AMS suit for this. The time step is not reaching the target value. But the energy error is increasing from the beginning. Need Hellp. Regards, SUBHU
  12. Hi All, 10 0.1266E-05 0.1266E-06 SPRIN 590305 0.0% 0.4177E-01 0.2840E+09 0.3311E-03 6.050 0.2584E-03 WARNING MINIMUM TIME STEP -0.4725E+18 IN INTERFACE 784 (DTMIN= 0.0000E+00) Is the time step goes in negative.!!! I haven't specified any values for dtmin in my type7 interface (id .784). But I am getting this warning at the start of my engine. Any Hint PLs. Regards, SUBHU
  13. Hi All, Does the MAT LAW 36 takes only plastic strain vs stress curve or total strain vs stress curve.? Regards, Subhu
  14. The External Work Forces is Decreasing. Is this Good??
×
×
  • Create New...