Jump to content

Vaibhav25

Members
  • Content Count

    36
  • Joined

  • Last visited

About Vaibhav25

  • Rank
    Advanced Member

Profile Information

  • Are you University user?
    Yes

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. Hi. I tried by giving a velocity of 100mm/sec. Very negligible deformation is happening and it looks like the rigid wall is moving to and fro as in the h3D file the deformation contour is coming and going. I am attaching the h3D file. The analysis not complete but still attaching. MAT36_02_inifiniteplane_1.h3d
  2. Hi. Ya here is the model. MAT36_02_inifiniteplane_1.hm
  3. hi. Iam trying to do the analysis with a rigid wall this time. But the problem is no deformation is taking place how much ever time i give and velocity. Mass i gave same as anvil.
  4. Hi Prakash thanks for the reply. In this graph the force values that is the interface/contact force is coming close to my experimental values. But again if you see the deformation in the structure the elements at the top are getting distorted. why is that. What was the run time you gave? and you used imposed displacement only? And one thing this time the elements are not folding inside like the previous one which is good. And how were you able to get this graph. Thanks again.
  5. Hi. I have done the meshing again this time i have set the correct criteria and the mesh is 99% correct. I have set all the conditions and contacts and also bcs_x for the anvil. But the anvil is also deforming again. honey_2mm_1.hm
  6. Hi. The full true stress-strain curve and yield to plastic is attached in the excel sheet. The curve is clearly explained in SHEET 2 of the excel file attached. I took 1st and 3rd values table from sheet2 for elastic and yield respectively in the two models (hm) sent to your Dropbox.
  7. Hi. I feel that this haphazard deformation has got something to do with the bonding. Because during the deformation process the elements are starting to fail from the corners and the hexagon itself is getting deformed instead of getting compressed and this happens only when I take the curve from yield to plastic. But when I take the curve from elastic to plastic range the deformation is absolutely correct and the trend of the graph also correct but the problem is in the magnitude of the force which is very less in terms of 900N and I require the magnitude in terms of 15000N. With the yield to plastic case the deformation is bad but the graph I get a good magnitude of force but very high that is 40000N.
  8. Hi. The following are the results obtained by taking the curve from yield to plastic. Deformation: yield.avi Graph: F vs d.
  9. Hi. I am defining only one curve, In the excel sheet i just have divided one(Same) curve into three parts that is 1) FULL stress-strain(till plastic) 2) Yield to plastic using two methods which are 1. by directly taking x-axis point corresponding to 0.2%strain and the other taking the x-axis point by drawing a line parallel to the elastic limit till it touches the curve. Basically, I'm just defining one curve at a time. I'm trying for only one strain rate. In one case with the full stress-strain curve and in the other one the curve from yield to plastic these two I'm doing separately and these results I posted earlier and said about the nature of the graphs.
  10. Hi. I have already defined the curve in the material card. i Have defined it under fct_iD and the name is yield. What you said in the above post is also same but the difference is you are getting the option under N_func. Whereas i am not getting any option after i select N_funs as 1. In place of that i am defining it in the next option that is fct_iD which you can see in my attached screenshot.
  11. Ok. Material card: The full true stress-strain curve and yield to plastic is attached in the excel sheet. The curve is clearly explained in SHEET 2. stress vs strain (al-3003)edited.xlsx
  12. Hi. case 1: This time I got the correct trend for the graph by taking the values from elastic to plastic region in MAT 36. But the main problem is the y-axis values of the graph. That is the force values are very less in terms of Newtons, not , matching with the experiment. case 2: And when I'm doing the same analysis with the values from yield to plastic for MAT 36 I'm not getting the correct graph but the y-axis values in terms of newtons are matching with my experiment. I'm attaching the screenshot of the first case and second case. case1: case2:
  13. yeah, life is there in the H3d file but it is in terms of seconds and i want life in terms of the number of cycles.
×
×
  • Create New...