Jump to content

Mrt

Members
  • Content Count

    211
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    4

Everything posted by Mrt

  1. at first i'll try to check units=) i think the same, results should be similar. linear buckling (without nnl step) results are the same.
  2. ok=) thank a lot. interesting, but i have different result from abaqus. ) the rate is 2.
  3. @Hyperman perfect!=) it works! my mistake was that i had used static nonlin-geom.) where did you find in UsGuide part about it feature?
  4. @Hyperman I've just tried to open file. Sorry, could you resave file on HM 2017, or just send .fem file?
  5. Wow! Thank a lot, Guys!:) I'll read and look at your attached files!
  6. Hello all! i have one question! is it possible in Optstrct to do these thing? i want to use nonlinear analysis (preload by weight) for linear buckling analysis/ any idea? thank a lot, Guys!
  7. you can try to use radioss quasi-static. to my mind radioss is better for contact ussues;)
  8. do you want connect "node to node"? or "node to node set"?
  9. are you kidding?=) @Ekaterina needs more topics!
  10. The penalization technique used is the “power law representation of elasticity properties,” which can be expressed for any solid 3D or 2D element as follows: K(r) = K*ρ^p where K and K represent the penalized and the real stiffness matrix of an element, respectively, ρ is the density and p the penalization factor which is always greater than 1. In OptiStruct, the DISCRETE parameter corresponds to (p - 1). DISCRETE can be defined on the DOPTPRM bulk data entry. P usually takes a value between 2.0 and 4.0. For example, compared to the non-penalized formulation (which is equivalent to p=1) at ρ=0.3, p=2 reduces the stiffness of the element from 0.3 to 0.09 times the stiffness of the fully dense element. The default DISCRETE is 1.0 for shell dominant structures, and 2.0 for solids dominant structures (the dominance is defined by the proportion of number of elements)
  11. i haven't done mesh fo cfd, i haven't ever worked in acusolve. as for me the best way to try=) do cube, and do diffrent approach/mesh size.=)
  12. https://altairuniversity.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/Optim_Interpretation.pdf
  13. you can't use one size fo all model. as i know you should use min/max and grow rate parameters. and my question to @acuprowhy can't i use several volumes separated by wall?
  14. hello! i am not cfd specialist. you do great job! it's interesting issue. is it windshield defrost? you should make 2 volumes. first are tubes second is cabin. and the WALL should be common part for tube and cabin (mesh node to node).
  15. what solver do you use? in optistruct is possible to do tie contact automatic=) tools->contact brouser->entities field mouse right button->autocontact->property type "freeze" for tie
  16. try to solve reduced model/part of model. it's difficult to search mistake in large model.
  17. have you tried to solve part of model? Has it gone? maybe it's so large for your computer?
  18. clear all previous files in work folder (close hyperview if it is opened). check penetration.
  19. it's interesting phenomena=) looks like scale factor 6 on OY=)
  20. hello, @Roy Duan! what tool did you use? have you ever used this feature for midmesh? Direct Midmesh Quick Start Guide - v1.pdf
  21. =) i think so if @Prakash Pagadala say that it wasn't possible you can't do it.
×
×
  • Create New...