Jump to content

pmcardle

Members
  • Content Count

    52
  • Joined

  • Last visited

About pmcardle

  • Rank
    Advanced User

Profile Information

  • Country
    United States
  • Are you University user?
    Yes

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. In my simulation I am considering the scattered far-field from my antenna over a box. If I am using the absorbing boundary condition, is the scattered field being absorbed by the air box? Or am I not conceptualizing this correctly.
  2. Thank you for the response. As a follow up, what is the boundary condition for the FEM? and how does it differ from the MoM boundary condition? Cheers, Patrick
  3. I want to simulate the electromagnetic back scattering response from half of a biconical antenna over an anisotropic half plane. Since FEKO does not support the use of a half plane with an anisotropic dielectric function I am instead trying to use a large box with the FEM. I have surrounded my system with an air buffer, but am receiving the following warning: ERROR 33132: Not enough memory available for an in-core solution. Out-of-core storage of the MoM matrix is not supported with the FEM See also message in the output file Model.out So are my options essentially to simulate with more memory such that the FEM-MoM matrix can be stored locally, or reduce the size of my simulation? Is it possible to simulate purely with the FEM with absorbing boundary conditions? If so how would one set this up? I have attached Model.cfxmy model below
  4. Is their a half planar Green's function implemented that supports a material with a 3d anisotropic dielectric function in FEKO? If it does not exist, is it because it has not been implemented or that it has not been formulated for a half plane?
  5. Is it possible to implement a electromagnetic source which has an incoherent phase front? I have been using a plane wave, but would like the phase for the source to be undefined.
  6. Is there a closed form expression for the spherical hankel functions used in the definition of spherical mode data? I have not been able to find any resources that use the smn indexing scheme.
  7. pmcardle

    Thin Metal

    Thank you for the replies
  8. pmcardle

    Thin Metal

    I have attached an image of the simulation. A plane wave is incident and focused by the mirror onto a conical conducting antenna, which is above a metallic layer. It is relevant to have a light source which converges to a focus, which necessitates the mirror. The antenna is above a thin layer of gold ~100 nm. I am simulating the gold by using the multilayered Green's function. I am calculating the scattered electric field from the antenna, in the far field. I have also performed the same simulation with a half planar PEC. For both I am getting inconsistent results for both the half planar PEC and multilayered green's function. Any suggestions on how to proceed?
  9. I have been trying to simulate the scattering of an antenna above a thin layer of gold ~100 nm. I am a plane wave source, the plane wave is focused using a mirror. After the mirror, the focused plane wave is used to illuminate the antenna and layer of gold. The simulation is using frequencies in the ~ THz, where the skin depth of Au is comparable to the thickness of the layer. Any suggestions for simulating the Au layer?
  10. pmcardle

    Thin Metal

    I have been trying to simulate the scattering of an antenna above a thin layer of gold ~100 nm. I am a plane wave source, the plane wave is focused using a mirror. After the mirror, the focused plane wave is used to illuminate the antenna and layer of gold. The simulation is using frequencies in the ~ THz, where the skin depth of Au is comparable to the thickness of the layer. I originally tried the multilayered Green's function and received this warning. WARNING 3489: Too many integration intervals are required for the potentials See also message in the output file The results were not consistent with experimental results. I than tried to simplify the problem by using a half plane PEC, and received results that were also inconsisent . Is there a better way to proceed? Should I increase the number of layers in the multilayered Green's function to reduce the number of integration intervals? Is the half plane PEC always reliable? Is there a way to check its reliability for a particular simulation?
  11. What would having two layers accomplish? Would it split up the integrations in both layers? Cheers, Patrick
  12. WARNING 3489: Too many integration intervals are required for the potentials See also message in the output file I am getting this error when using the half planar green's function. I have switched to a multilayered green's function to reduce the thickness of the material which has a small effective wavelength. Does reducing the volume help alleviate this warning? or does it only depend on the effective wavelength and size of the problem. I am still receiving this warning when I use the multilayered green's function.
  13. I am running a simulation where the effective wavelength in one of my layers is quite small. Does decreasing the thickness of this layer speed things up since less effective wavelengths will be in this layer?
  14. If my extents are set to 50e2, does this mean that the simulation space is 1000 x 1000 x 1000 for whatever unit is being used.
  15. Thanks, for the reply. As a follow up, does this error occur because the model is to electrically large? Or does it also depend on the effective wavelength in the half plane?
×
×
  • Create New...