Jump to content

Andoni Garcia

Members
  • Content Count

    40
  • Joined

  • Last visited

About Andoni Garcia

  • Rank
    Advanced Member

Contact Methods

  • MSN
    agmatxain@gmail.com

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male
  • Are you University user?
    Yes

Recent Profile Visitors

518 profile views
  1. Hi Anthony, How much RAM does your computer have? These are the hardware requirements recommended for Flux depending 2D / Skew / 3D / PEEC: You can get more extended information (Graphic Card, etc.): Flux Supervisor top right "?" icon / PDF Documentation / Instalation Guide. I hope it has been helpful for you. Best regards, Andoni
  2. Dear magneto, I would like to get more details about the way you solved that file. I have been simulating some files that didn't have solved because it jumped your same error and nobody could get solved it. Best regards, Andoni
  3. Hi everyone, I corrected the electric-loop problem, and I tried to solve the file. The thing is that an error 49 has appeared, I think that is related with the meshing: Anyone can help me, please? Best regards, Andoni ELCorrected_CooledSec_1xPrimary.7z
  4. Hi Jerome, The positive direction of Z goes out the screen and the negative, into the screen. Sometimes, the html documentation of Flux is useful to me, you'll find here: Best regards, Andoni
  5. Thank you Farid Zidat, This is the same primary coil's step file solved individually: And it's also taken into account that distance in geometry options, but I think that you'd adviced to create the insulation face to have the surety not to occur any short-cut, right? If you want to check it, you've got the STEP file down below. -------------------------------------------------------- Did you have solved propertly using Mumps instead of ICCG? Not to me: Thanks for your help, Andoni Primario02_ 5_112.STEP
  6. Hi! Someone can help me with this problem? ICGSS_ERROR.FLU.7z
  7. Hi Abdessamed, Thanks for the response but it also doesn't solve the file at this way. I would like to ask the criteria you used in the meshing. I saw that you deleted the secondary winding (& meshed with "Medium" mesh") and changed the primary winding mesh to 3.5mm. Do you use any kind of calculation? Thanks, Andoni
  8. Hi, I've been simulating with that solid conductor (secondary terminal of a transformer) WITHOUT cooling holes and coupling the primary winding. I didn't have any problems at all. Secondary terminal: The problem arised as soon as I simulated the same system, using the secondary with the cooling holes instead of the solid one: I've followed the same steps that I'd done with the solid one. I checked the physics and it advises me to create the Electric Loops (as other occasions), but when I run the solver, unlike other times it stops changing the warning to an Error: You can get the file here below : TRAFO_PROTOTYPE.7z
  9. Good morning Abdessamed, To avoid future problems, I would be so grateful if you could explain me what is a "Singular Matrix" a little more in depth. When can I localise this error? On the one hand, I can understand that Flux can´t solve errors made by geometry, or a wrongly assigned physics, but a mesh error... Wouldn't it only influence in calcules precision? Sorry but I'm in two minds. Thank you so much for your support.
  10. Hi Abdessamed. Okay, I didn't done any electrical loop but the problem persist. This is the error message from the solver. I've done all that you've adviced before solving, do you get results with the file I'd sent? (Create a face in the middle of the geometry, Complete Infinite Box). I'm drawing through the "Modeler Context", I don't think so but is there any construction error there? Never tire of repeating, thank you so much.
  11. These are the steps I've done: - I created the tube geometry (body & holes) - Clicked "Complete Infinity Box" & Assign volume regions - Do the meshing - Create the circuit & assign terminals - Physical check: When using Electric Loop, I made the following steps: "Automatic creation of cuts", "Electric Cut creator" (ElectricLoopCut_3) & once again checked physics: After all this, it is necesary to create once again Electric Loops? Here it is this file: Tubo_12.FLU.7z Thank you, once again. Andoni
  12. OK! Could you specify please why have I to do that? Why is it not enough just creating a infinity box? Perfect. In XZ and YZ planes? I started drawing this tube due to the fact that I didn't get solve some errors that came to the cooling holes of this geometry. I've noticed that the error arises when I create the upper horizontal hole of the tube that connects the vertical holes, the automatical detection of cuts, doesn't create all the detected holes, so next to this I created the missing electric loops. Finally I checked the physics and it seems that this last step breaks the connection between the 2 terminals, i.e., it detects only 1 terminal. I would like to add that before creating this hole, the automatic creation of cuts does create all the holes of the sistem, I don't need to appeal to the "manual" Electric Loop creator. I'll read and try all your advices, let's see if I get a solution. Thanks lot Abdessamed. Best regards, Andoni
  13. Here it is. Thank you Error_Tubo.FLU.7z
  14. Hi, I'm doing some cooling orifices to a solid conductor using "Modeler Context" and when I use "Automatic Creation of Cuts" (of Electric Loops), it creates less cuts than the identified ones. What can I do in this situations? Modifying the geometry would be the only solution? Thanks
×
×
  • Create New...