Jump to content

Search the Community

Showing results for tags 'cube'.



More search options

  • Search By Tags

    Type tags separated by commas.
  • Search By Author

Content Type


Forums

  • Altair Support Forum
    • Welcome to Altair Support Forum
    • Installation and Licensing
    • Modeling & Visualisation
    • Solvers & Optimization
    • Multi Body Simulation
    • Conceptual design and Industrial design
    • Model-Based Development
    • Manufacturing Simulation
    • CAE Process Automation
  • Academic Partner Alliance Forum
    • APA - Composites
    • APA - CFD & Thermal
    • APA - Vehicle Dynamics
    • APA - Manufacturing
    • APA - Crash and Safety
    • APA - Noise, Vibration and Harshness
    • APA - System Level Design
    • APA - Structural and Fatigue
    • APA - Marine
    • APA - Optical Design
  • Japanユーザーフォーラム
    • ユーザーフォーラムへようこそ
    • Altair製品の意外な活用例
    • インストールとライセンス
    • モデリング(プリプロセッシング)
    • シミュレーション技術(ソルバー)
    • データ可視化(ポストプロセッシング)
    • モデルベース開発
    • コンセプト設計と工業デザイン
    • 製造シミュレーション
    • CAE プロセスの自動化
    • 学生向け無償版
    • エンタープライズソリューション

Categories

There are no results to display.


Find results in...

Find results that contain...


Date Created

  • Start

    End


Last Updated

  • Start

    End


Filter by number of...

Joined

  • Start

    End


Group


AIM


MSN


Website URL


ICQ


Yahoo


Jabber


Skype


Interests


Organization

Found 2 results

  1. Hello, Im a student. I am trying to realize a topological optimization of a cube. the goal is volume / mass optimization. I have a cube (my design space) with a hole that acts as a tapping, a 1mm thick plate that is connected to my cube and is encased (the first boundary condition); My cube is connected to a 2D plate by rigid elements of type RBE2. This 2D plate undergoes a force of 40 on one side (I do not want more to stay in the elastic domain) and is encased on the other side ( second boundary condition ) I impose optimization conditions on the RBE2 rigid point moving along the X, Y, Z axes. My problem is that no matter what I use, I do not get any shape ... all I have is semi-dense area (density between 0.5-0.7) and the closer I get to 1 and the more I get nothing, and the reduction in volume is 95% 93%, which seems really huge. At first, I tried to increase the moving constraints of my optimization problem because I had constraint violations when I parsed the .out file. Now I have no more constraint violations but still have a decent topology ... I'm stuck. I do not know if I have badly defined my optimization problem, if my geometry is not good ( i dont think that can be the problem ), or if my optimization answer is not the right one. TETRA_Piece_3x3.hm
  2. My question is somehow similar to this one here: I already conducted a simulation with OptiStruct similar to the one shown in the mentioned thread. I understand that possible contact surfaces are only defined in the undeformed state. However, my aim is to obtain a more advanced simulation. Is there a modeling approach that looks for new contact surfaces (within a defined search distance) during the calculation? Here is the hm-file of my test model: cylinder_cube_contact.hm And here a short outline of the model (unit system: N-mm-t-s): cube with edge length = 1 cylinder with diameter as well as length = 1 element size: 0.1 material: E = 210000 NU = 0.3 property card image: PSOLID force on each node = 1 (110 loaded nodes) all nodes at the lower side of the cube are constraint (dof 123456 locked) 2 sets of contact surfaces. one for each component interface card image: CONTACT type: FREEZE slave: cylinder contact surface master: cube contact surface MORIENT: NORM SRCHDIS = 0.01 load step: Linear static with SPC and LOAD analysis type defined
×
×
  • Create New...