Jump to content

Search the Community

Showing results for tags 'hertzian stress'.



More search options

  • Search By Tags

    Type tags separated by commas.
  • Search By Author

Content Type


Forums

  • Altair Support Forum
    • Welcome to Altair Support Forum
    • Installation and Licensing
    • Modeling & Visualisation
    • Solvers & Optimization
    • Multi Body Simulation
    • Conceptual design and Industrial design
    • Model-Based Development
    • Manufacturing Simulation
    • CAE Process Automation
  • Academic Partner Alliance Forum
    • APA - Composites
    • APA - CFD & Thermal
    • APA - Vehicle Dynamics
    • APA - Manufacturing
    • APA - Crash and Safety
    • APA - Noise, Vibration and Harshness
    • APA - System Level Design
    • APA - Structural and Fatigue
    • APA - Marine
    • APA - Optical Design
  • Japanユーザーフォーラム
    • ユーザーフォーラムへようこそ
    • Altair製品の意外な活用例
    • インストールとライセンス
    • モデリング(プリプロセッシング)
    • シミュレーション技術(ソルバー)
    • データ可視化(ポストプロセッシング)
    • モデルベース開発
    • コンセプト設計と工業デザイン
    • 製造シミュレーション
    • CAE プロセスの自動化
    • エンタープライズソリューション
    • データアナリティクス
    • 学生向け無償版

Categories

There are no results to display.


Find results in...

Find results that contain...


Date Created

  • Start

    End


Last Updated

  • Start

    End


Filter by number of...

Joined

  • Start

    End


Group


AIM


MSN


Website URL


ICQ


Yahoo


Jabber


Skype


Interests


Organization

Found 2 results

  1. Hi everybody, I'm quite new to the world of analysis involving contact interfaces, so after reading something on the Optistruct help and taking a look at a couple of tutorials, I decided to try to build a FE model for the simple case of a cylinder pressed against a plane, to compare FEA results with the Hertzian theory. Here's a brief summary of the model I built (which you can find attached): Cylinder: 50 mm diameter x 100 mm length Plane: 200 mm x 100 mm (in-plane size) x 40 mm (thickness) Both parts are made of steel (E = 200 GPa, v = 0.3, rho = 7900 kg/m^3) All nodes on the lower face of the steel plate are connected through an RBE2 spider to a single node, which is constrained in all 6 DoFs A force of 1000 N (applied as pressure) is pushing the cylinder against the plate I defined the CONTACT as "STICK", set ADJUST = 0.0 and DISCRET = S2S, Slave surface is the cylinder and Master surface is the plate (Despite what I've written above to describe the model, all units used are consistent: length [m], pressure [Pa], density [kg/m^3]) Unfortunately, analysis results are not even close to what the Hertzian theory predicts (I used as reference: https://amesweb.info/HertzianContact/HertzianContact.aspx), as you can see from the following pictures (maximum contact pressure: predicted 118.3 MPa, calculated 3.11 MPa). Do you have any idea on why is this the case? Searching on the internet I realized that many studies in which Hertzian theory predictions are reproduced via FEA use a much finer mesh in the contact area: can this be the only reason for such a big difference in results? Thank you in advance to anybody who will be willing to help me or to give me his point of view: any suggestions are welcome. Best regards, Manuele Plane-Cylinder.fem
  2. Hello everybody, I'm a Student and have to do a thesis. The thesis is about a FEA about an large bearing. But I'm a beginner in Hypermesh. Does someboby has some tips for modeling of the isssues "initial bolt prestress", "hertzian stress" and general Information which is important to consider?
×
×
  • Create New...