Jump to content

Search the Community

Showing results for tags 'marker'.



More search options

  • Search By Tags

    Type tags separated by commas.
  • Search By Author

Content Type


Forums

  • Altair Support Forum
    • Welcome to Altair Support Forum
    • Installation and Licensing
    • Modeling & Visualisation
    • Solvers & Optimization
    • Multi Body Simulation
    • Conceptual design and Industrial design
    • Model-Based Development
    • Manufacturing Simulation
    • CAE Process Automation
  • Academic Partner Alliance Forum
    • APA - Composites
    • APA - CFD & Thermal
    • APA - Vehicle Dynamics
    • APA - Manufacturing
    • APA - Crash and Safety
    • APA - Noise, Vibration and Harshness
    • APA - System Level Design
    • APA - Structural and Fatigue
    • APA - Marine
    • APA - Optical Design
  • Japanユーザーフォーラム
    • ユーザーフォーラムへようこそ
    • Altair製品の意外な活用例
    • インストールとライセンス
    • モデリング(プリプロセッシング)
    • シミュレーション技術(ソルバー)
    • データ可視化(ポストプロセッシング)
    • モデルベース開発
    • コンセプト設計と工業デザイン
    • 製造シミュレーション
    • CAE プロセスの自動化
    • 学生向け無償版
    • エンタープライズソリューション

Categories

There are no results to display.


Find results in...

Find results that contain...


Date Created

  • Start

    End


Last Updated

  • Start

    End


Filter by number of...

Joined

  • Start

    End


Group


AIM


MSN


Website URL


ICQ


Yahoo


Jabber


Skype


Interests


Organization

Found 4 results

  1. Hi guys, I'm trying to evaluate the reaction forces on both the translational joints (they have been modeled as compliance joints in order to do not get redundant constraints). To achieve this result, I need to apply a motion between the piston (green one) and the case of the cylinder (yellow one) using makers, but the system fails to reach the convergence. I would like to know how to apply the motion using markers, since seems to be quite tricky to me. Thank you all.
  2. Hello, I'm having a little confusion with defining a motion using markers. As seen in attached image, even though all translation and rotations which are available can be defined with respect to marker 2, there is still a selection for marker 1, which seemed irrelevant to me. I have checked the doc page, and what it says about the marker 1 and marker 2 fields is: "Select the first and second markers to which to the motion is applied." I find this confusing, as there are translation/motion options only for marker 2. And by intuition, I should need only one marker to define a motion with respect to it. Why do I need to select a marker 1? I would appreciate any information to clarify this. Thank you. Sincerely
  3. I want to capture the animation for crash simulation with crash and IE side by side. While playing the animation, I am able to see the marker but when I goes to capture animation in any format (eg. .avi), animation I get not shows the marker progressive position. Please help us with the same.
  4. Dear MotionView users, *** Note: I've also posted this message in the 'MotionSolve' section of this forum. But I think this location is more suitable for the question. *** I've constructed a model in which an object should follow a curve. This object is modeled in Solid Edge and the geometry is imported. Since the origin of the curve can slightly deviate, the body that should be in contact with the curve is not exactly aligned with the curve on the first sample. Now I got the following warning from the solver: WARNING: Marker I NOT coincide with curve in Body J! Minimum Distance = 6.610E+00 Initial PT-CV U = -9.766E-01 I would like to suppress this warning (or change the checking criteria) since I'm ignoring the warning if the initial offset is small. Can someone help me suppressing this warning or changing the criteria for the check? Kind regards, Geert-Jan
×
×
  • Create New...