# Search the Community

Showing results for tags 'numerical methods'.

• ### Search By Tags

Type tags separated by commas.

### Forums

• Altair Support Forum
• Welcome to Altair Support Forum
• Installation and Licensing
• Modeling & Visualisation
• Solvers & Optimization
• Multi Body Simulation
• Conceptual design and Industrial design
• Model-Based Development
• Manufacturing Simulation
• CAE Process Automation
• APA - Composites
• APA - CFD & Thermal
• APA - Vehicle Dynamics
• APA - Manufacturing
• APA - Crash and Safety
• APA - Noise, Vibration and Harshness
• APA - System Level Design
• APA - Structural and Fatigue
• APA - Marine
• APA - Optical Design
• Japanユーザーフォーラム
• ユーザーフォーラムへようこそ
• Altair製品の意外な活用例
• インストール / ライセンス / その他
• モデリング（プリプロセッシング）
• シミュレーション技術（ソルバー）
• データ可視化（ポストプロセッシング）
• モデルベース開発
• コンセプト設計と工業デザイン
• 製造シミュレーション
• CAE プロセスの自動化
• エンタープライズソリューション
• データアナリティクス
• 学生向け無償版(Altair Student Edition)

• 0 Replies

• 0 Reviews

Found 2 results

1. ## How does AcuSolve compute the residual ratios and solution ratios that are used to check for convergence?

The residual ratios used by AcuSolve are a non-dimensional measure of how "out-of-balance" the governing equations are. The residual ratios are recomputed at each timestep to give an indication of how well the solution is converging. The solution ratio that is computed by AcuSolve represents the ratio of the change in the solution between timesteps to the solution at the previous timestep. This value indicates the level of unsteadiness present in the solution. Note that the solution ratios and residual ratios are computed using the contribution of each node in the model. The single value is obtained by taking the appropriate norm of the contribution from each node. The details of this procedure are described in the attached document.
2. ## What differencing scheme does AcuSolve use and how can I change it?

AcuSolve uses the Finite Element Method to discretize the governing equations. By default, AcuSolve uses linear shape functions and Gaussian quadrature to perform the necessary integrations. This results in a numerical method that is second order accurate in space. Although there is no direct comparison to the common diferencing schemes found when using the finite volume method, this approach most resembles central differencing with a small amount of upwinding blended locally when necessary for stability. There is no way to reduce the spatial accuracy of AcuSolve below second order, however, quadratic tetrahedra elements are supported to increase the spatial accuracy above second order.
×
×
• Create New...