Jump to content
pshivashankar

Discrepancy between FEM mass and mass during optimization

Recommended Posts

Greetings,

 

I have a FEM model whose mass calculated by Hypermesh (under Tools > masscalc) is equal to 2.22 kg

 

I am running a free-size optimization of this model. From the design parameters summary reflected in the *.out file (shown below), the sum of design and non-design mass is equal to 2.51524 kg:

 

After the iterations begin, the mass registered in iteration 0 is 2.34766 kg

 

Question: Is it wrong to expect the following: FEM mass = (design + non-design mass) = mass at iteration 0? Why are these values different?

 

Quote

 

 ---------------------------
   Design Parameters Summary :
   ---------------------------
   Total # of free-sizing design elements          :     34684
   Total # of free-sizing cards                    :         1

   Total Volume of Design Material :   9.3119E-05
     Total Mass of Design Material :   4.1904E-01
     Volume of Non-Design Material :   7.0062E-04
       Mass of Non-Design Material :   2.0962E+00

 

 

 

Quote

 

ITERATION   0

 *** INFORMATION # 3454
 MPC constraints for subcase 1 will be enforced
 with lagrange multipliers.

 (Scratch disk space usage for starting iteration = 65356 MB)
(Running out-of-core solution)
Objective Function (Min(Max) EQATN) =  4.50698E+07
Maximum Constraint Violation %      =  0.12535E+03
Design Volume Fraction              =  6.00000E-01   Mass     =  2.34766E+00

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Update:

 

During the FE modeling in Hypermesh, design space and non-design space were not explicitly defined by the user.

 

What is the basis for Optistruct to decide and distinguish between design and non-design spaces?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 hours ago, pshs4123 said:

Update:

 

During the FE modeling in Hypermesh, design space and non-design space were not explicitly defined by the user.

 

What is the basis for Optistruct to decide and distinguish between design and non-design spaces?

 

Hi, what do you mean by at red marking?

how did you set up your optimization problem?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Tinh,

 

The goal is to optimize the thickness of the insert region subject to stress and mass constraints (I have read that simultaneous definition of mass and stress constraints is not a good idea. I'm still trying to a figure out a way around this). The insert itself has a network of ribs and stiffeners inside which isn't seen in the picture below.

Picture1.thumb.png.9af288ba03d23d3e58ceebb692bdf5e2.png

 

During the DV definition, I have chosen the PSHELL cards corresponding to only the insert. This would mean that my design space refers only to the insert and everything else in the model is the non-design space. Am I correct?

 

Moreover, if the above assumption is correct, the FEM mass of the insert as seen in Hypermesh and the 'total mass of design material' as seen in the *.out file must be equal. Isn't it?

 

Any inputs or critiques are highly appreciated. Thank you!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, you are correct.

In hypermesh tools>masscalc you select only designed PSHELLs to get designed mass, it should be equal to 'mass of design material' in .out file

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On ‎5‎/‎15‎/‎2020 at 7:31 PM, pshivashankar said:

I have a FEM model whose mass calculated by Hypermesh (under Tools > masscalc) is equal to 2.22 kg

 

I am running a free-size optimization of this model. From the design parameters summary reflected in the *.out file (shown below), the sum of design and non-design mass is equal to 2.51524 kg:

 

After the iterations begin, the mass registered in iteration 0 is 2.34766 kg

 

But I get different masses as shown above. What might be the reason?

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, please sign in.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...